It is already more then two millenniums for mankind from the start of the not scientifically counting of the new time, which is today, causally saying, official.
New era began in the slavery time. At that time, the culture, knowledge and technical means didn’t give any more possibilities and casuals for real development scientific thought in the counting of astronomic and calenderer time. At that time people didn’t know our self place in the surrounding Cosmos, in order to contribute more through astronomy to the more correct solutions in calenderer time counting.
Too much time is before us for allow us still doing so little to correct some fallacies and scientific inconsistency.
Without looking back, we can’t forgot the contribution of old Greek astronomer Aristech from Samos (310 – 230 b.c.), witch, in that time, “dared” to show its theory about the place of the Earth in the rounding Universe. They thought, that Aristech is first com on the idea about rotation the Earth round the its axis and the Sun. Aristech also found the mode witch permitted to calculate the distance between the Earth and the Sun and between the Earth and Moon, what got theoretical possibilities to calculate earth’s rotation around Sun. About that he was accused for atheism and their theory gone to the oblivion. We don’t know how he is finished his life, but it is the cause that this his observation not was actual till to XVI century. During this period regent Ptolemy’s theory.
In the middle XVI century the Polish astronomer Nikolai (Mikolai) Copernicus grab from the forgot this knowing and published in 1543 year, under the title “About rotation of haven bodies ” (“De Revolutionius Orbitum Coelestium”), a couple of day before his death. In this work Copernicus, in the time the rigid inquisition, on the most modern mode treated heliocentrically theory. That discovery is all the bigger, because the conditions and means, by which it could be checked and proved, were on a very low degree of development in comparison to today’s, but mathematically was respected.
The work was criticized harshly by Pope Paul III, and that’s why the work waited for a long time for confirmation. The theory was confirmed by Galileo Galileo in 1610., after telescope invention and after following the Moon’s and Venus’ movements. About that, Ptolemy’s theory of geocentrically world system, must be refuted.
Is it possible to find stronger reasons that could refute the classification to count of old and new time then the time in which lived Copernicus? Was not more than 90% of the achievements in the human progress made in the time and after time of Copernicus? Sixteenth century is introducing much changes u scientific, cultural and spiritual life in the world in positive sens. Wouldn’t we so, in a true sense pay our respect to the genius Aristech and Copernicus, who, in the conditions, in which they lived and worked, came to such an epochal discovery? Wouldn’t it lead to, eventually, giving up different time counting also in other parts of the world? By this way, obliging gratitude to the man who made scientific discovery of use to whole mankind be impartially paid.
Alongside, the correction of this astronomic parameter, it would be high time to, eventually make equal astronomic and calendar beginning and the end of the year. So if the nature wasn’t perfect to arrange the Earth’s rotation around the Sun for ideal round number of the days – why today – in the computer era, can’t we exactly follow such an earth’s “imperfection”? If we announce the coming of the year’s seasons, exactly in minutes and second – why can’t we also the NEW YEAR? It can be connected to winter or summer period of the Earth rotation extremes. It is more real that be winter extreme, about the considerable great part of the people live on the north hemisphere. Why should we deprive those born in February of ¾ of their birthdays? Is it a bigger problem for one day to have two dates, which is a reality, than only to correct the calendar every fourth year for a whole day?! Astronomically, every day is double date.
In base of said, every year should to have 366 the dates, and 366 days every forth year. It is also more normally, that 6 mounts have 30 days and 6 mounts 31, except December, witch – every tree year has 31 dates and every fourth year 31 days. Is it possible that mankind can’t correct possessive wish of Rome’s emperors, who not be interesting for scientific opinion of there time. Same, would has and its economical and psychological explanation. Possible that is disputable and names of months, but it is much smaller problem.
The marking of the years need be, in honor of Copernicus and Aristech with KA, by example, 506.KA – our actual year. Years of old time would be made with prefix – (minus) and new time without.
It is enough only not prohibit in following ten years, along actual date in brackets input and new date. Behind that period it is need to estimate justify that mode of counting of the time. In case that this mode of the counting was confirmed, it need in followed five years right new time without brackets and old in brackets. If it was confirmed, it need right only new time.
I am looking for like-minded persons especially that whose birthday is 29th February, to hold this idea and I propose to count years from December 21st 1499, like first year of NEW ERA and correct the mistake lasting more then 2000 years.
Surely that about this cutting is possible to much discuses, but not possible to do great injustice to nobody, being that daily date precision, before this period, is enough doubtful.
